🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in graves at risk from shoreline retreat state that a lack of decision on how best to address the problem is causing them unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their loved ones.

A Looming Threat to Historic Graveyards

The council have singled out three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being consumed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue details a series of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure locations. Authorities say it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. People will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing looking for treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Along the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while working abroad. His mother expressed she lost sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to consider this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

She believes, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Several families are calling for more sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to continue for now. Others argue the time for relocation is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to decide the path to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with residents.”

He added there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no common view on what should happen yet. It requires good community discussions to find the right solutions for each community.”

The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sadness for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in life after death, providing a spiritual perspective on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.